I owned a Honda Hawk NT650 for about 3 months and 2,000 kilometres/over 1,000 miles. I was intrigued, but I never fell in love. To explain why I bought it, how I evaluated it, and why I’m selling it, I’m sharing my Honda Hawk GT NT650 Review.

I initially bought the Honda Hawk NT650 because I wanted a smaller motorcycle than my Ducati Monster that I’d still like and that I could teach my girlfriend to ride on. (But not as small as the even smaller Honda Bros 400! — which you can’t get in America, anyway.)

After reading a bit about the Honda Hawk, I thought — this could be it!

There’s a lot to admire about the humble Hawk GT. Because I spent a lot of time with it and had a chance to form a balanced opinion, I wanted to get some of my thoughts down for posterity.

Honda Hawk GT NT650 review - inspiring the later Ducati Monster with its single-sided swingarm and simple naked frame
My red Honda Hawk GT. Complete with single-sided swing-arm and smart aluminium frame.

Quick notes about me: I’ve ridden for twenty years. I’m not a speed demon, I’m not a “get your knee down” road racer, and I’m an intermediate track rider at best. I’ve owned over a dozen motorcycles and ridden a dozen more and loved all of them in some way. I have many more motorcycles to ride and there’s no question that anything on two wheels beats being stuck in a cage when you’re on a beautiful, winding road. But I’m still in search of the Forever Motorcycle, those two wheels that will keep me loyal forever. I know they’re out there!

Are you obsessed with motorcycles?

Well, I am. That’s why I created this site — as an outlet. I love learning and sharing what others might find useful. If you like what you read here, and you’re a fraction as obsessed as I am, you might like to know when I’ve published more. (Check the latest for an idea of what you’ll see.)

Background about the Honda Hawk GT — Why buy it?

In summary, what I liked about the Honda Hawk was the cute design, light weight, V-twin motor, Honda reliability, and the rabid fan-base online.

In more detail, there were a few specific things that caught my attention about the Honda Hawk GT:

  1. It has a design that was later hawked (pun VERY INTENDED) by the Ducati Monster, most notably the single-sided swing-arm — previously not often seen on non-race motorcycles.
  2. It pioneered the naked chassis, round headlight design — later made popular by the Monster, the Suzuki SV650, and others. The design still looks good today!
  3. It’s compact and lightweight in its class, with a fully-fuelled (wet) weight of 412 lbs (187 kg) — similar to modern designs
  4. The engine is very well “balanced” — producing a modest claimed 55 hp (though a dyno-tested ~40 hp at the wheel), it’s not a 100 hp screamer like the CBR600F, nor underpowered for fast American highways like a 250cc Ninja.
Red Honda Hawk NT650 front diagonal
Front view of the Honda Hawk GT. See that design — hasn’t aged a day. Well the mirrors look a bit old

One of my mechanics, Lucy from SF, is a self-proclaimed “big fan” of the Honda Hawk. I’m sure she could make it sing in ways I never was able to. Maybe my tastes aren’t refined enough!

On top of all that, I read a review in Canyon Chasers singing the praises of the Honda Hawk.

It included this paragraph:

The loyal following of the bike is legendary!

At a recent international motorcycle show, I spoke with Hondas North American director of R&D.

We had a fifteen-minute discussion on Hawk GTs where she admitted to currently owning two of the humble little bikes and claimed it was her main inspiration for the new line of 500s, the CB500F, CB500X, and CBR500R.

Virtually every motor-journalist has owned one and the Internet following puts the passion of Ducati and Harley Davidson to shame – particularly when you consider the bike was only made between 1988 and 1991.

It is, without question, one of our all-time favourite motorcycles.

Source, slightly edited

Wow! Is this loyalty true?? If so, then the Honda Hawk GT is one of those cult classic motorcycles that everybody regrets selling and reflects on fondly for the rest of their lives. If that’s the case then I’d have no regrets buying one. I love me a classic motorcycle.

The thing about cult classics to bear in mind is that the fans are fiercely loyal. Since this isn’t a review of falling in love with a motorcycle, I’ve gotten my share of flak for it. There are some worthwhile criticisms, like that I should have taken it in for a tune. But at the end of the day, not every motorcycle is for everyone — so hopefully I sold it to someone who’ll fall in love.

So after finding one for US$2,200 in Berkeley, CA, I wandered over, did some tests to make sure it held together and paid $2,000 to take home a motorcycle I was sure I’d fall in love with instantly.

But didn’t fall in love with the adorable Hawk GT. Here’s why.

Overview: The Honda Hawk GT is Cute, but Not Fast

There’s no question that the Hawk GT still looks great. It even sounds great, even with a stock exhaust… as long as you remove the silencer.

But the first thing I noticed about the Hawk GT was that it was … not fast. Yes, I knew ahead of time that it just had 39 hp under the seat.

I had ridden slow motorcycles before, like the lower-powered Ninja 250 (probably closer to low 30s actually, and delivered higher in the RPM range). And one of my favourite motorcycles is the Triumph Scrambler, which has a claimed 55hp – probably closer to 50 at the crank.

Comparing the Triumph Scrambler and the Honda Hawk GT NT650 — both of which have a claimed 55hp at the crank — is like night and day. The Scrambler has power for days. The Hawk feels like it’s struggling as soon as you get to about 75 mph. Yes, the Hawk goes faster (some ride them up to 120 mph… I never took mine past around 100, as it just didn’t feel fun), but at that point it’s not easy power.

red Honda Hawk NT650 left hand side body shot
Another side shot of the Hawk GT. Say what I like about it, it looks great!

In the US, to stay in traffic on a regular highway you need to do 75-85 mph just to keep up with other traffic. In other words, if you’re maxing out at 75 mph, then you’re a liability.

When I had the Hawk GT at 75mph, I could twist the throttle further and it would move, but only in a significant way if I downshifted a couple of times. It also felt unstable. Not like it was wobbling, but more that wind was flowing over it and me in an uneven way that didn’t feel re-assuring.

Again, this wasn’t my first naked motorcycle. I had pretty much exclusively ridden nakeds, and it’s well known that I have a love affair with the Ducati Monster. I’ve also ridden other nakeds that are similar weight at higher speeds. I am very familiar with having wind all over me at highway speeds. But the Hawk GT just didn’t feel like that was its zone.

I’m an engineer, but I never studied fluid dynamics. All I know is that you don’t need a full fairing to have a motorcycle that’s stable in the wind.

A couple of commentators have said that perhaps my Hawk needed to be looked at. It’s true — if I could go back, I’d have taken it to a mechanic and gotten them to do a compression check, balanced the carbs, and done a tune. I’m sure I could have coaxed more out of this.

I’m definitely expecting way too much from a motorcycle made 30 years before I bought it. I could definitely have put that $2,000 towards a much more modern Suzuki SV650 — probably with fuel injection and a bunch of other improvements.

Finally, I was hoping the Hawk GT would be lighter. While it was light for the time, it’s not light by modern standards, especially for learner motorcycles. So the Hawk GT was not a good motorcycle to help my girlfriend learn. She needed a smaller, lighter motorcycle. This isn’t really a fault of the GT — I didn’t even get her to sit on it and check it out first! That was something I promised to rectify the next time.

What I learned from the Honda Hawk

There’s still a lot I loved about the Honda Hawk GT. I loved how it fired right up, even when cold, despite having a 30-year old carburettor system. I loved the purtle from the exhaust. I loved riding a bit of history.

Like all motorcycles, it taught me about my own personal tastes, and helped me understand that my personal perfect power band is 75-100hp. Everyone’s is different (some lower, some much higher). We’re all on that journey.

Tastes are a little dependent on location, too. The 40 horsepower just isn’t enough for fast Californian highways where 85mph is the norm and 100mph is sometimes acceptable.

But I didn’t love that I had to work so hard just for my daily ride. So, with my eye on an even smaller motorcycle from a nearby dealer, I sold it.

Red Honda Hawk NT650 diagonal photo
Honda Hawk GT. It went to a better home.

Similar Posts


  1. Well, perhaps this 32-year-old bike that you bought was low on compression, had gummed-up, un-synced carbs and poor electrics.
    Unless you put it on a dyno, you have no idea if your bike had anywhere close to the rated power. The top speed, I think, of that bike was well over 100 mph. If you were wheezing at 75 mph, clearly there are major mechanical problems with your bike. You’re tarring the bike with your one, lone poor example.

    1. Thank you, this is a good point. I just thought “This is what 40-45 hp feels like”. It’s still such a cool bike that if I had more garage space I’d have loved to give it more mechanical attention and really get it to its full potential and make a proper assessment then.

      So many people (maybe like you) love the bike, that there’s got to be more to it than what I observed with that one example.

      To clarify what I meant though, its top speed was well over 75 mph, but it just didn’t *lurch* forward at that speed. I had other bikes that topped out at 75mph, like my Virago 250, and this was definitely a lot faster than that!

      1. Sorry, but if the Hawk GT,s virtues are lost on you, you missed the finer points of this cult classic.

        Light, nimble and powered just fine to 110 mph is how my Hawk behaves.
        Sounds like yours had poor tune conditions and maybe looks like the wrong front wheel are possible contributors to the conclusion reached about the bike.
        With a stock pipe, airbox and mild jet kit, my 1988 powers up from 85mph to the limit just fine. Ideal for LA canyons or new England backroads, even easy highway touring with soft bags, these bikes were way ahead of their time and only get better with age.
        The 3 valve Vtwin pulls actually better than the 2005 Vstrom I just sold and while light years from my 2003 6th generation VFR 800 interceptor, it foreshadows the great characteristics of that award winning bike.
        I’ll sum up intentions for the one owner 25K mile blue 1988 Hawk GT residing in my 6 bike Honda quiver… not for sale anytime soon!

        Respectfully, Rider to Rider- Josh H.

  2. I rode one of these for 9 years and 85000k. Ultra reliable, as in bulletproof! Easy to maintain, joy to ride.
    Mine would pull around 200kph or 120mph on the top end with the only mod being a supertrapp exhaust for the sound. So I think yours may have had some issues. I took several long trips with no issues keeping up with traffic. I found it capable of 90mph all day long. After 9 years I decided I wanted a dualsport, wish I had never sold her.

  3. I will never forgive Honda for totally screwing up a much anticipated bike…not the 650 Hawk, but the Super Hawk that they teased my soul with, promising to bring forth the whole time they offered the 650. I’ve owned a total of (5) 650 Hawks over the years. I love the look, the mechanics, the ride and the attitude (just bought my present one last year and THIS TIME I won’t be selling it for something bigger/better/faster).

    And the Super Hawk? Bite me, Honda. I and everybody I know thought the Super Hawk would be much more closely patterned after the Hawk (read NAKED, with real instrumentation instead of Ducati-like superbike minimal add-ons… and those gimmicky side mounted radiators? Nothing in the history of motorcycling has ever so bitterly disappointed me.

    1. I’m sorry you’re disappointed! I feel your pain — can be really frustrating waiting for something you think would be perfect and then it’s not.

      That said, there are lots of satisfied Super Hawk riders (I rode with one last weekend — and he had crashed it and rebuilt it beautifully). So maybe it was what some people wanted.

  4. If it feels like it’s struggling above 75 mph there’s something seriously amiss. I have a mostly stock ’88 Hawk GT and a 2000 Aprilia SL1000 Falco. Even though the Falco is so much more in basically every respect, when it comes to bike-induced grinning it can’t hold a candle to the Hawk which has not even half of the Falco’s power. If ever I have to sell one, the Hawk’s keyes would most definitely not be the ones I hand over as I still love the thing to bits.

  5. Well, as the proud owner of a Hawk GT, and one of my favorite all time bikes, I have to agree that the GT is best enjoyed under 75-80 mph. I ride New England back roads and the Hawk is in its element, however I avoid highways at almost all costs.

    I think that the Hawk really shines with some suspension upgrades, radial sport tires, and braided lines. For me a quarter fairing is necessary on any naked bike.

    To those that have claimed they gone 100 mph or more on your Hawk, hmmm…. Doesn’t sound fun to me.

  6. Yeah I have to add my thoughts on this. I’m glad you tried it but you clearly had a lemon as 85mph is definitely no problem (easy and comfortable) and mine would wind up to 115 no problem and would probably top out just over 120. 85mph would be doable all day. As for feeling twitchy at those speeds (with or without a fairing) again I would have a look at the head bearings and the suspension, something was seriously amiss, some people like quarter fairings (I have them on one bike), I’ve never felt the need for it on this bike (again everyone is different, there’s no wrong answer on this one). This bike’s handling was way ahead of its time and mine has always felt planted even with an increased length rear shock.

    It’s unfortunate you had those experiences and they were clearly real for you, I hope that someone reading this reads the comments of other folks with this bike to get a sense of what many of us experience.

    As an aside a friend in the early 2000s was looking for a 650 twin. I recommended the Hawk. She wanted something new (less problems) I suggested an SV650 or a W650. She went with the SV and was very happy with it. Rode the hell out of it. On paper its the better bike.

    She borrowed my Hawk for 3 weeks and I got a call as soon as she got it home. On the highway she looked down and realised that it was doing 100 (the speedo was always a little optimistic but she was still hauling ass). She absolutely loved those three weeks because it had so much character and despite its size a kind of “desire” to push on with that midrange.

    A brilliant little bike. If you get a chance to ride one again that you know is “sorted”, give it a whirl, I suspect it’ll put a smile on your face.

    1. Yeah, that sounds very different to mine. I should have had it looked at! I really would like to give it a second chance. There’s a lot I did earlier in my motorcycling days that I’d like to do better, and to do the Hawk justice is one of them. Glad yours is in good hands!

      1. Am just getting mine back on the road. As it’s been stored as a result of many moves. It’ll be a little while but you’re welcome to ride it if you want. Where are you based?

  7. I regret selling mine. I was recently stuck in an MRI machine and used the half hour with my thoughts to relive some of the most memorable rides I’ve had. One of those is the White Mountains with my NT650, carving up the Kanc. I remember getting up pre-dawn on a brisk Boston Sunday, sipping coffee while letting the engine warm up, revving it a few times, then feeling guilty about seeing lights turn on in my apartment building. I had just been working on the bike and wanted to give it the once over before setting off. Escaping the sleeping city as the sun came up, opening the throttle on the on ramp to the highway. I can still feel the air on my neck and through the visor slit open since it had been fogging. That feeling is more memorable with your wrist fully twisted. I guess I liked the throttle response and handling on that bike, something visceral, something my Ducati Monster wanted to be but just wasn’t. My Hawk was somewhere between your experience and some of the other commenters. 75 was smooth and easy, but 110 was not– for sure yours needed a tune up. I remember selling it to trim the herd before a move out west. My main justification was the lack of fuel injection my Monster had. Strange though that, thinking back, many of my fondest memories are on bikes without fuel injection. Sorry for the ramble! Tl:Dr — I miss my Hawk and not my Monster.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.